[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17763235#comment-17763235
]
Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-5985:
--------------------------------------
I agree. Perhaps retain an instance of the rule that continues to match only
{{LogicalFilter}} and {{LogicalTableScan}}, and also add a new instance that is
generic.
Also, use the {{filter}} and {{functionScan}} methods in {{RelBuilder}}.
> FilterTableFunctionTransposeRule should not use "Logical" RelNodes
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-5985
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5985
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Reporter: Steve Carlin
> Priority: Major
>
> The FilterTableFunctionTransposeRule uses LogicalTableFunctionScan and
> LogicalFilter RelNodes in its rule. We should be using the appropriate
> TableFunctionScan and Filter interface RelNodes instead.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
