[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17817484#comment-17817484
 ] 

Mihai Budiu commented on CALCITE-6210:
--------------------------------------

Your approach seems to be the only one reasonable based on my knowledge of 
Calcite's capabilities. 

The principled way to solve this would be to have Calcite handle casts like 
library functions, and allow them to have dialect-dependent implementations. 
But I don't know whether that's possible without major surgery on the codebase.

One issue that complicates rewriting casts is the fact that Calcite often 
leaves casts implicit in the code rather than inserting explicit casts. If all 
casts were explicit your job would be much easier. The good news is that there 
aren't many legal casts to/from BINARY values, so you have fewer cases to 
consider.

> Cast to VARBINARY causes an assertion failure
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-6210
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6210
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 1.36.0
>            Reporter: Mihai Budiu
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> This test in SqlOperatorTest:
> {code:java}
>  SqlOperatorFixture f = fixture();
>  f.checkScalar("CAST('00' AS VARBINARY)", "00", "VARBINARY NOT NULL");
> {code}
> Causes the following assertion failure:
> {code}
> java.lang.AssertionError: value 00 does not match type class      
> org.apache.calcite.avatica.util.ByteString
>       at 
> org.apache.calcite.linq4j.tree.ConstantExpression.<init>(ConstantExpression.java:51)
>       at 
> org.apache.calcite.linq4j.tree.Expressions.constant(Expressions.java:585)
>       at 
> org.apache.calcite.linq4j.tree.OptimizeShuttle.visit(OptimizeShuttle.java:305)
>       at 
> org.apache.calcite.linq4j.tree.UnaryExpression.accept(UnaryExpression.java:39)
>       at 
> org.apache.calcite.linq4j.tree.TernaryExpression.accept(TernaryExpression.java:47)
>       at 
> org.apache.calcite.linq4j.tree.DeclarationStatement.accept(DeclarationStatement.java:45)
>       at 
> org.apache.calcite.linq4j.tree.DeclarationStatement.accept(DeclarationStatement.java:27)
>       at 
> org.apache.calcite.linq4j.tree.BlockBuilder.optimize(BlockBuilder.java:426)
>       at 
> org.apache.calcite.linq4j.tree.BlockBuilder.toBlock(BlockBuilder.java:340)
>       at 
> org.apache.calcite.rex.RexExecutorImpl.compile(RexExecutorImpl.java:102)
>       at 
> org.apache.calcite.rex.RexExecutorImpl.compile(RexExecutorImpl.java:68)
>       at 
> org.apache.calcite.rex.RexExecutorImpl.reduce(RexExecutorImpl.java:133)
>       at 
> org.apache.calcite.rex.RexSimplify.simplifyCast(RexSimplify.java:2272)
>       at org.apache.calcite.rex.RexSimplify.simplify(RexSimplify.java:292)
>       at 
> org.apache.calcite.rex.RexSimplify.simplifyUnknownAs(RexSimplify.java:250)
>       at 
> org.apache.calcite.rex.RexSimplify.simplifyPreservingType(RexSimplify.java:189)
>       at 
> org.apache.calcite.rex.RexSimplify.simplifyPreservingType(RexSimplify.java:184)
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to