[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17822353#comment-17822353
]
Ran Tao commented on CALCITE-6285:
----------------------------------
[~mbudiu]the calcite implementation is compatibled with <= spark-3.4.1.
see:
{code:java}
spark-sql (default)> SELECT array_insert(array(5, 3, 2, 1), -4, 4);
[4,5,3,2,1]
{code}
When I implemented it, the latest version was 3.4.1, and now 3.4.2 and 3.5.0
have fixes.
More background: This function is not Spark's own native function, but is used
to benchmark Snowflake. This function has not been particularly stable. FYI:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-45078
https://lists.apache.org/thread/1p5hkql96k5qc5ww6wkd7mq6qdbgyz1n
> Function ARRAY_INSERT produces an incorrect result for negative indices
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-6285
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6285
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Affects Versions: 1.36.0
> Reporter: Mihai Budiu
> Priority: Minor
>
> Here is a test taken from the Spark documentation page:
> https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/api/sql/index.html#array_insert
> {code}
> SELECT array_insert(array(5, 3, 2, 1), -4, 4);
> [5,4,3,2,1]
> {code}
> The result produced by Calcite is:
> [4,5,3,2,1]
> The strange thing is that there are tests for negative indices. I wonder if
> the original tests are wrong, or the behavior of this function in Spark was
> changed since the tests were written.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
