[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17871771#comment-17871771
 ] 

Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-6516:
--------------------------------------

[~lchistov1987], Thanks for coming up with a test case. It helps make the 
discussion more concrete.

I believe there are existing jira cases requesting that we use more bits for 
the "accumulator" of AVG and STDEV aggregate functions than the final result. 
If the final step is a division by a positive integer, and therefore loses some 
bits, clearly those extra bits are sometimes required. Can you look up those 
cases? Maybe this is a duplicate of one of those.

> AVG to SUM+COUNT transformation inserts invalid CAST call
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-6516
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6516
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.37.0
>            Reporter: Leonid Chistov
>            Priority: Major
>
> As described in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4911.
> In Calcite:
> {code:java}
> select avg(comm) as a from "scott".emp{code}
> This SQL physical plan is:
> {noformat}
> EnumerableCalc(expr#0..1=[{inputs}], expr#2=[0], expr#3=[=($t1, $t2)], 
> expr#4=[null:DECIMAL(19, 2)], expr#5=[CASE($t3, $t4, $t0)], 
> expr#6=[CAST($t5):DECIMAL(7, 2)], expr#7=[/($t6, $t1)], 
> expr#8=[CAST($t7):DECIMAL(7, 2)], A=[$t8])
>  EnumerableAggregate(group=[{}], agg#0=[$SUM0($6)], agg#1=[COUNT($6)])
>    EnumerableTableScan(table=[[scott, EMP]]){noformat}
> Problem here is that cast of SUM result to DECIMAL(7, 2) is not correct and 
> may cause overflow error at runtime or result in not expected data truncation.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to