[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17876094#comment-17876094
 ] 

Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-6534:
--------------------------------------

[~mbudiu], Thank you for merging PRs that are ready, but please check jira 
before you do so. I identified a problem with the commit message that has not 
been fixed, and now cannot be fixed without a force-push. If you don't check 
jira, my efforts reviewing cases are wasted.

> Adjust type when pulling up Calc in JoinUnifyRule
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-6534
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6534
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: suibianwanwan
>            Assignee: suibianwanwan
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 1.38.0
>
>
> In JoinOnLeftCalcUnifyRule, JoinOnRIghtCalcUnifyRule, JoinOnCalcUnifyRule, 
> calcite tries to pull up the calc operator to make Query equivalent to target 
> . In CALCITE-6501, for the case where the assert is due to a difference in 
> nullablity, we do an early intercept and return null. This will result in 
> some cases that can be rewritten not being able to be rewritten.
> Therefore, We can adjust the nullability of the type if this rewrite 
> maintains semantics. if RexNode satisfies null-if-null, we will adjust the 
> nullability, if not, we should reject this rewrite regardless of the 
> nullablility.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to