[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17884074#comment-17884074
]
Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-6584:
--------------------------------------
[~mbudiu], I saw your note in the PR that {{"UPDATE emp AS e SET e.deptno =
10"}} is not actually valid in Postgres. I think it's OK that Calcite is more
permissive than Postgres in this case. I intend to merge the PR shortly, adding
a note to the test case.
> Validate prefixed column identifiers in SET clause of UPDATE statement
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-6584
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6584
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Reporter: Niels Pardon
> Assignee: Niels Pardon
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 1.38.0
>
>
> Add missing validator implementation for prefixed column identifiers in SET
> clause of UPDATE statement as a follow-up to
> [CALCITE-6576|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6576]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
