[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mihai Budiu resolved CALCITE-6677.
----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 1.39.0
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in
https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/7865c86efb9b45656bb099147f4ab1b297b84fcf
Thank you for the bug report, diagnosis, and review [~etracy]
Thank you for the review [~caicancai]
> HAVING clauses fail validation when type coercion is applied to GROUP BY
> clause
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-6677
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6677
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Tracy Sassaman
> Assignee: Mihai Budiu
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 1.39.0
>
>
> Given a sql statement like:
> select if(EMP.empno <= CAST(18 AS DOUBLE), 'youth', 'adult') as adult_or_child
> from EMP
> GROUP BY if(EMP.empno <= CAST(18 AS DOUBLE), 'youth', 'adult')
> HAVING if(EMP.empno <= CAST(18 AS DOUBLE), 'youth', 'adult') = 'adult'
>
> Sql Validation fails with the error:
> org.apache.calcite.sql.validate.SqlValidatorException: Expression 'EMP.EMPNO'
> is not being grouped
>
> Root cause: A cast is applied to the group by clause, to make it GROUP BY if(
> CAST (EMP.empno AS DOUBLE) <= CAST(18 AS DOUBLE), 'youth', 'adult')
> But no such cast is applied to the Having Clause. Consequently, an equality
> comparison on the two fails
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
