[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17934497#comment-17934497
 ] 

Thomas Rebele edited comment on CALCITE-6886 at 3/17/25 2:09 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

In the example, #10-PhysLeafRel appears out of the blue in the FINAL step. Good 
opportunity to check why this is the case.

Other things to fix
 * if there's a ?step=33 argument, nothing is viewed because of an error: 
data.steps[prevStepIndex] is undefined.
 * setIncludeIntermediateCosts(true) adds the cost to the data file, but does 
not affect the visualization.


was (Author: thomas.rebele):
In the example, #10-PhysLeafRel appears out of the blue in the FINAL step. Good 
opportunity to check why this is the case.

Another things to fix
 * if there's a ?step=33 argument, nothing is viewed because of an error: 
data.steps[prevStepIndex] is undefined.
 * setIncludeIntermediateCosts(true) adds the cost to the data file, but does 
not affect the visualization.

> RuleMatchVisualizer should merge sets when the planner detects their 
> equivalence
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-6886
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6886
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Thomas Rebele
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: CALCITE-6886.png
>
>
> If the planner merges two sets when they have been determined to be 
> equivalent, the RuleMatchVisualizer does not merge them in the visualization. 
> Instead, it keeps the second set with the subsets but no RelNode inside.
> To reproduce the issue, apply the RuleMatchVisualizer to 
> VolcanoPlannerTest.testSetMergeMatchSubsetRule(). The set-2 should be merged 
> into set-0, and the subset#11-set#2 into subset#12-set#0:
> !CALCITE-6886.png!
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to