[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17939585#comment-17939585
]
Alessandro Solimando commented on CALCITE-6930:
-----------------------------------------------
{quote} # Could be inefficient if the OR condition is very selective but
individual conditions are not.
{quote}
I don't think the selectivity of the OR can be lower than that of its operands.
Am I reading the sentence correctly? If not, can you provide an example?
> Implementing JoinConditionOrExpansionRule
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-6930
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6930
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Zhen Chen
> Assignee: Zhen Chen
> Priority: Major
>
> JoinConditionOrExpansionRule transforms a join with OR conditions into a
> UNION ALL of multiple joins.
> For example, the SQL:
> SELECT * FROM emp JOIN dept
> ON emp.deptno = dept.deptno OR emp.deptno = dept.mgr
> Will be transformed into:
> SELECT * FROM emp JOIN dept ON emp.deptno = dept.deptno
> UNION ALL
> SELECT * FROM emp JOIN dept ON emp.deptno = dept.mgr
> The original plan:
> LogicalJoin(condition=[OR(=(deptno, deptno), =(deptno, mgr))])
> LogicalTableScan(table=emp)
> LogicalTableScan(table=dept)
> Is transformed to:
> LogicalUnion(all=[true])
> LogicalJoin(condition=[=(deptno, deptno)])
> LogicalTableScan(table=emp)
> LogicalTableScan(table=dept)
> LogicalJoin(condition=[=(deptno, mgr)])
> LogicalTableScan(table=emp)
> LogicalTableScan(table=dept)
> Benefits:
> # Each individual join can use hash-join algorithm, which is more efficient
> than nested-loop joins required for OR conditions.
> # Each join branch can independently choose its optimal join implementation.
> # The joins can be executed in parallel.
> # Individual joins may be able to use indexes that would not be usable with
> OR conditions.
> The rule only fires when:
> # The OR condition contains only simple equi-join conditions (comparing
> columns between left and right inputs).
> Limitations and considerations:
> # May not improve performance if individual joins produce large results that
> need to be union-ed.
> # Could be inefficient if the OR condition is very selective but individual
> conditions are not.
> # Multiple hash tables may cause memory pressure.
> # The optimizer should consider statistics and cost estimates when applying
> this rule.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)