[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-7073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17986592#comment-17986592
 ] 

Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-7073:
--------------------------------------

We release every 2 - 3 months. The release will be called 1.41.0. Of course you 
can build your own snapshot of Calcite from the main branch, if you wish.

> If the Java return type of a UDF is ByteString, Calcite should deduce that 
> the SQL type is VARBINARY
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-7073
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-7073
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: Lucas Brenner
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 1.41.0
>
>
> If a Java user-defined function (UDF) has return type {{ByteString}}, Calcite 
> should deduce that the SQL return type is {{VARBINARY}}.
> Calcite uses {{org.apache.calcite.avatica.util.ByteString}} internally to 
> represent {{VARBINARY}}. However, when introducing a custom function that 
> returns {{{}ByteString{}}}, such as {{UNBASE64}} (which decodes a Base64 
> string to bytes), its return type defaults to {{OTHER}}. This occurs because 
> there is no explicit mapping for {{ByteString}} in the 
> {{JavaToSqlTypeConversionRules}} class.
> [PR 4440|https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/4440] adds the necessary 
> mapping.
> The added test {{testUnbase64DirectComparison}} provides a scenario where 
> this bug occurs. If we remove the mapping introduced in the PR, we get the 
> following error:
> {noformat}
> Error while executing SQL "select "adhoc".unbase64(cast('dGVzdA==' as 
> varchar)) = x'74657374' as C
> ": From line 1, column 16 to line 1, column 66: Cannot apply '=' to arguments 
> of type '<OTHER> = <BINARY(4)>'. Supported form(s): '<COMPARABLE_TYPE> = 
> <COMPARABLE_TYPE>'
> {noformat}
> This demonstrates that {{UNBASE64}} *erroneously defaults* to the type 
> {{OTHER}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to