[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18038480#comment-18038480
]
Alessandro Solimando commented on CALCITE-4467:
-----------------------------------------------
I have never researched on using a custom RexSimplify but that sounds like a
reasonable ask and not a "poke a hole" request to me
> Incorrect simplification for 'NaN' value
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-4467
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4467
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Reporter: Jesús Camacho Rodríguez
> Assignee: Jesús Camacho Rodríguez
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 1.27.0
>
> Time Spent: 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> {{RexSimplify}} simplifies {{x = x}} to {{null or x is not null}} (similarly
> <= and >=), and {{x != x}} to {{null and x is null}} (similarly < and >).
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/master/core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/rex/RexSimplify.java#L363
> This may not be applicable in some cases. For instance, if the type of x is
> floating-point, x could be 'NaN'. While some RDBMS consider 'NaN' = 'NaN'
> (e.g., Postgres), some others consider 'NaN' != 'NaN' following the IEEE 754
> standard. For the latest, the rewriting above will result in incorrect
> results.
> I think we should simply ignore this simplification for floating-point type.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
