[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Mostafa Mokhtar updated CALCITE-468:
------------------------------------
    Description: 
The basic idea is to apply join predicates early in a plan in order to reduce 
the size of intermediate query results and, thus, reduce the cost of other 
operations. In other words, the idea is to apply the same join predicates twice 
or more often in a query plan

In order to reduce the communication costs of a distributed system. Obviously, 
semi-join reducers are only effective if the (redundant) semi-joins are cheap 
and result in a significant reduction of the size of intermediate
query results.

I propose to extend a query optimizer and integrate semi-join reducer and
join-ordering, etc. into a single query optimization step

Several TPC-DS queries like 24, 64 & 80 run very slow do to the lake of semi 
join reduction optimization in Calcite.

Doing a rewrite of Q64 to simulate semi join reduction produced 4x gains.

{code}
Query                   Total time           CPU        Intermediate rows 
(Million)
Baseline                        1,377    356,900                            
23,940
Semi Join Reduction             343       47,253                                
23
{code}

Q64 subset 
{code}
select 
    count(*)
FROM
    store_sales
        JOIN
    item ON store_sales.ss_item_sk = item.i_item_sk
        JOIN
    store_returns ON store_sales.ss_item_sk = store_returns.sr_item_sk
        JOIN
    (select 
        cs_item_sk
    from
        catalog_sales
    JOIN catalog_returns ON catalog_sales.cs_item_sk = 
catalog_returns.cr_item_sk
    group by cs_item_sk
    having 
sum(cs_ext_list_price) > 2 * sum(cr_refunded_cash + cr_reversed_charge + 
cr_store_credit)) cs_ui 
ON store_sales.ss_item_sk = cs_ui.cs_item_sk
WHERE
    i_color in ('maroon' , 'burnished',
        'dim',
        'steel',
        'navajo',
        'chocolate')
        and i_current_price between 35 and 35 + 10
        and i_current_price between 35 + 1 and 35 + 15
{code}



  was:
Currently OPTIQ doesn't push down aggregates for bushy joins and this can be a 
performance limitation in some queries.

Ideally before we push down the aggregate we should take into the account the 
NDV and reduction of the join which we are trying to push the aggregate 
underneath.

On Hive to measure potential gains I wrote a query which has the following 
business question based on the TPC-DS schema:
Identify customers from specific gender with good credit rating that spent more 
than X amount of money during a specific year.

This query has 3 main components
1) Hub containing store_sales & date_dim
2) Hub containing customer and customer_demographics
3) Aggregate

And for that query I have 2 rewrites :
1) Rewrite that generates a bushy join plan
2) Rewrite that generates a bushy join plan and pushes the aggregate down

Results show that aggregate push down in a bushy plan cuts down the query 
runtime by half.
The aggregate push down reduces the intermediate data in the query from 384GB 
to 22GB.

Base query finishes in 4,781 seconds with 2,253 GB of intermediate data 
Bushy query finished in 1,374   seconds with 384GB of  intermediate data
Bushy query + aggregate push down finished in 605 with only 22GB of  
intermediate data.

Base query
{code}
"select 
    c_customer_sk, sum(ss_net_paid) as net_paid
from
    customer,
    customer_demographics,
    store_sales,
    date_dim
where
    c_current_cdemo_sk = cd_demo_sk
        and cd_credit_rating = 'Good'
        and cd_gender = 'F'
        and ss_customer_sk = c_customer_sk
        and ss_customer_sk is not null
        and d_year = 2001
        and d_date_sk = ss_sold_date_sk
group by c_customer_sk
having net_paid > 0
order by net_paid desc
limit 100;"
{code}

Bushy query
{code}
with ss as 
( 
select 
    ss_net_paid, ss_customer_sk
from
    store_sales,date_dim
where
    d_year = 2001
        and d_date_sk = ss_sold_date_sk
        and ss_customer_sk is not null
), cc as 
(
select 
    c_customer_sk
from
    customer,customer_demographics
where
    c_current_cdemo_sk = cd_demo_sk
        and cd_credit_rating = 'Good'
        and cd_gender = 'F'
)
select 
    c_customer_sk, sum(ss_net_paid) as net_paid
from 
    cc,ss
where
    ss_customer_sk = c_customer_sk
group by c_customer_sk
having net_paid > 0
order by net_paid desc
limit 100;
{code}

Bushy query + aggregate push down
{code}
{code}



> Introduce semi join reduction optimization in Calcite 
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-468
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-468
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Mostafa Mokhtar
>            Assignee: Laljo John Pullokkaran
>              Labels: hive
>
> The basic idea is to apply join predicates early in a plan in order to reduce 
> the size of intermediate query results and, thus, reduce the cost of other 
> operations. In other words, the idea is to apply the same join predicates 
> twice or more often in a query plan
> In order to reduce the communication costs of a distributed system. 
> Obviously, semi-join reducers are only effective if the (redundant) 
> semi-joins are cheap and result in a significant reduction of the size of 
> intermediate
> query results.
> I propose to extend a query optimizer and integrate semi-join reducer and
> join-ordering, etc. into a single query optimization step
> Several TPC-DS queries like 24, 64 & 80 run very slow do to the lake of semi 
> join reduction optimization in Calcite.
> Doing a rewrite of Q64 to simulate semi join reduction produced 4x gains.
> {code}
> Query                 Total time           CPU        Intermediate rows 
> (Million)
> Baseline                      1,377    356,900                            
> 23,940
> Semi Join Reduction           343       47,253                                
> 23
> {code}
> Q64 subset 
> {code}
> select 
>     count(*)
> FROM
>     store_sales
>         JOIN
>     item ON store_sales.ss_item_sk = item.i_item_sk
>         JOIN
>     store_returns ON store_sales.ss_item_sk = store_returns.sr_item_sk
>         JOIN
>     (select 
>         cs_item_sk
>     from
>         catalog_sales
>     JOIN catalog_returns ON catalog_sales.cs_item_sk = 
> catalog_returns.cr_item_sk
>     group by cs_item_sk
>     having 
> sum(cs_ext_list_price) > 2 * sum(cr_refunded_cash + cr_reversed_charge + 
> cr_store_credit)) cs_ui 
> ON store_sales.ss_item_sk = cs_ui.cs_item_sk
> WHERE
>     i_color in ('maroon' , 'burnished',
>         'dim',
>         'steel',
>         'navajo',
>         'chocolate')
>         and i_current_price between 35 and 35 + 10
>         and i_current_price between 35 + 1 and 35 + 15
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to