[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14943933#comment-14943933
 ] 

Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-906:
-------------------------------------

Fixed in 
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-calcite/commit/afcf3a6c. (Not 
including unique connection IDs.)

> Avatica JdbcMeta statement IDs are not unique
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-906
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-906
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: avatica
>            Reporter: Jan Van Besien
>            Assignee: Julian Hyde
>         Attachments: CALCITE-906-attempt-to-reproduce.patch, CALCITE-906.patch
>
>
> There seems to be a concurrency-related problem with the statementId that is 
> generated in the JdbcMeta#createStatement for statements in the 
> statementCache.
> We use avatica to create a driver which uses the remote RPC protocol to wrap 
> an existing jdbc driver on the server. We have a test which performs 
> concurrent queries on multiple connections (using apache commons-pool) which 
> fails often.
> If it fails, the following two things are always observed:
> * A java.lang.AssertionError on the assert in Meta#count(String connectionId, 
> int statementId, long updateCount), resulting in the server to send a http 
> 500.
> * When logging all used connectionId's and statementId's, I observe the same 
> statementId to be re-used for different connectionId's.
> I don't know exactly how these two problems are related, but it looks like 
> statementId's are supposed to be unique and currently they are not.
> The current approach is  to use System.identityHashCode(statement) to 
> calculate a statementId. Simply replacing this with a random int seems to 
> solve the problem.
> Depending on what the actual uniqueness requirements for the statementId are, 
> a UUID might be even better (but will have impact on the RPC) or an 
> AtomicInteger.
> I'll attach a patch for the random int fix.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to