[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13272678#comment-13272678
 ] 

Babak Vahdat commented on CAMEL-5172:
-------------------------------------

Christian, thanks for the hint & the link as well. Seems I have to be more 
careful while expressing myself as there seems to be a bit of politics while 
choosing the "wording".

With "My personal vote" I did mean "My personal opinion" but according to the 
link you did provide it does really mean "voting"!

Though still a question: I did also put some "funny" comments into CAMEL-4341 
just for the sake of a relaxed atmosphere as well as good mood. Is there also 
something wrong with that as well?
                
> TypeConverter - Tighten up API to rethrow failed exception during type 
> conversion, and introduce new API for try to convert
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-5172
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5172
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: camel-core
>            Reporter: Claus Ibsen
>            Assignee: Claus Ibsen
>             Fix For: 2.8.5, 2.9.3, 2.10.0
>
>
> The org.apache.camel.TypeConverter API would not propagate exceptions that 
> would occur during type conversion back to the caller. But instead return 
> null.
> We should tighten this up and introduce a new API for trying to convert, so 
> what we would have is
> - convertTo = converts, and throws exception if failure during conversion, 
> can return null, if no value to convert, or no type converter exists to do 
> this
> - mandatoryConvertTo = convertTo + will throw exception if no value, eg it 
> never returns null
> - *new* tryConvertTo = convertTo but will catch exceptions and return null 
> (like the old behavior)
> This introduces an API change in TypeConverter. But it is more intuitive. 
> There is some internal logic that needs to be adjust a bit due they rely on 
> the old behavior.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to