[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13288900#comment-13288900
]
Babak Vahdat edited comment on CAMEL-4857 at 6/4/12 9:26 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
IMHO the *CORE* question should not be if Camel uses URIs correctly or not but
more important than that if Camel is *REALLY* 100% backward-compatible by it's
minor releases which to my understanding is much much more important than to be
100% IETF RFC_XYZ complaint.
In this concrete case the user reporting this issue (on Jan. 3rd) was
struggling to upgrade to a newer Camel version a day before (on Jan. 2nd) which
then ended up with:
https://plus.google.com/103504600126086444972/posts/5q1aFtYLryi
@Alexander please correct me if I'm wrong.
Anyway, I think this's really sad :-(
was (Author: bvahdat):
IMHO the *CORE* question should not be if Camel uses URIs correctly or not
but more important than that if Camel is *REALLY* 100% backward-compatible by
it's minor releases which to my understanding is much much more important than
to be 100% IETF RFC_XYZ complaint.
In this concrete case the user reporting this issue (on Jan. 3rd) was
struggeling to upgrade to a newer Camel version a day before (on Jan. 2nd)
which then ended up with:
https://plus.google.com/103504600126086444972/posts/5q1aFtYLryi
@Alexander please correct me if I'm wrong.
Anyway, I think this's really sad :-(
> Endpoint URI normalization: information in path is lost
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-4857
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4857
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: camel-core
> Affects Versions: 2.9.0
> Reporter: Alexander Azarov
> Assignee: Claus Ibsen
> Fix For: Future
>
>
> A project with a test case is here: https://github.com/alaz/camel290_uri
> The test case with the problem description (the problem occured during
> migration of camel-beanstalk https://github.com/osinka/camel-beanstalk
> component onto 2.9.0):
> {code:title=UriTest.java}
> package camel290.uri;
> import java.util.Map;
> import org.apache.camel.Consumer;
> import org.apache.camel.Endpoint;
> import org.apache.camel.Processor;
> import org.apache.camel.Producer;
> import org.apache.camel.impl.DefaultComponent;
> import org.apache.camel.impl.DefaultEndpoint;
> import org.apache.camel.test.CamelTestSupport;
> import org.junit.Before;
> import org.junit.Test;
> import static org.junit.Assert.*;
> public class UriTest extends CamelTestSupport {
> /**
> * An URI of Camel Beanstalk component consists of a hostname, port and a
> list
> * of tube names. Tube names are separated by "+" character (which is more
> or less
> * usualy used on the Web to make lists), but every tube name may contain
> URI special
> * characters like ? or +
> */
> class MyEndpoint extends DefaultEndpoint {
> String uri = null;
> String remaining = null;
> public MyEndpoint(final String uri, final String remaining) {
> this.uri = uri;
> this.remaining = remaining;
> }
> public Producer createProducer() throws Exception {
> throw new UnsupportedOperationException("Not supported yet.");
> }
> public Consumer createConsumer(Processor prcsr) throws Exception {
> throw new UnsupportedOperationException("Not supported yet.");
> }
> public boolean isSingleton() {
> return true;
> }
> }
> class MyComponent extends DefaultComponent {
> @Override
> protected Endpoint createEndpoint(final String uri, final String
> remaining, final Map<String, Object> parameters) throws Exception {
> return new MyEndpoint(uri, remaining);
> }
> }
> @Before
> @Override
> public void setUp() throws Exception {
> super.setUp();
> context.addComponent("my", new MyComponent());
> }
> @Test
> public void testExclamationInUri() {
> /**
> * %3F is not an ?, it's part of tube name.
> */
> MyEndpoint endpoint =
> context.getEndpoint("my:host:11303/tube1+tube%2B+tube%3F", MyEndpoint.class);
> assertNotNull("endpoint", endpoint);
> }
> @Test
> public void testPath() {
> /**
> * Here a tube name is "tube+" and written in URI as "tube%2B", but it
> gets
> * normalized, so that an endpoint sees "tube1+tube+"
> */
> MyEndpoint endpoint = context.getEndpoint("my:host:11303/tube1+tube%2B",
> MyEndpoint.class);
> assertEquals("Path contains several tube names, every tube name may have
> + or ? characters", "host:11303/tube1+tube%2B", endpoint.remaining);
> }
> }
> {code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
