Raymond created CAMEL-22731:
-------------------------------
Summary: Add enabled to route node
Key: CAMEL-22731
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-22731
Project: Camel
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 4.16.0
Reporter: Raymond
Though maybe not so well documented, route nodes can be disabled. This is
useful when for example temporary you don't want to use a certain node.
I use this principle in Kamelets. This allows me to have various parts in one
Kamelet route that can be enabled with a boolean property on the Kamelet.
Here is an example:
- choice:
disabled: "\{{useThisFunction}}"
when:
- simple: "${header.ASSIMBLY_RetryAttempts} == null"
steps:
- setProperty:
name: "ASSIMBLY_originalHttpMessageMethod"
constant: SET
- process:
ref: SetOriginalMessageProcessor
This works as intended. However, the thing is from a low-code tool there are
on/off toggle switch where a user can enable a function or not. But because
true disables it, the question is:
_Set to false to enable function X_
A solution could be that when enabled (true) on the frontend then send it as
false to the backend (Camel), but this doesn't make sense to me.
Would it be possible to use a NOT operator in Kamelets:
- choice:
disabled: "\{{!useThisFunction}}"
Or add a positive enabled to a route (default is true)
- choice:
enabled: "\{{useThisFunction}}"
Note it's already possible to do \{{?useThisFunction}} for null values, and as
a boolean is a primitive it cannot be null anyway. __
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
