[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-24440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18124912#comment-18124912
 ] 

Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-24440:
-------------------------------------

Merged to main: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/27504 (4.23.0). Kept open 
for the backport to 4.22.x. _Claude Code on behalf of davsclaus_

> camel-crypto - CryptoDataFormat validates the MAC after decrypting, reuses 
> the cipher key for the HMAC, and has no per-message IV
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-24440
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-24440
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components:  camel-crypto
>            Reporter: Andrea Cosentino
>            Assignee: Andrea Cosentino
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 4.22.2, 4.23.0
>
>
> Four related issues in {{CryptoDataFormat}}:
> 1. *MAC checked after decryption.* {{unmarshal()}} runs the body through 
> {{CipherInputStream}} to completion before {{HMACAccumulator.validate()}} is 
> called. Tampered input therefore surfaces as two distinguishable failures - 
> {{IOException}} (bad padding, from the cipher) versus 
> {{IllegalStateException}} (bad MAC) - rather than one uniform authentication 
> failure.
> 2. *Key reuse.* {{HMACAccumulator}} is constructed with the HMAC key derived 
> from the same {{key.getEncoded()}} used for the cipher. The same key material 
> is used for both confidentiality and integrity.
> 3. *MAC values in the failure message.* {{HMACAccumulator.validate()}} builds 
> its exception message with both the expected and the computed MAC in hex.
> 4. *No per-message IV.* {{getInitializationVector()}} returns the header 
> value or the statically configured {{initVector}}; nothing ever generates a 
> fresh one. {{marshal()}} even throws when {{inlineInitVector=true}} and no 
> static IV was configured, which steers users towards a fixed IV for exactly 
> the feature that exists to carry a per-message one. The javadoc notes the IV 
> need not be secret but never that it must be unique.
> Proposal: derive separate cipher and MAC keys from the configured key (HKDF 
> or equivalent); validate the MAC before releasing plaintext, or move to an 
> AEAD mode; report a single uniform authentication failure without embedding 
> MAC values; and generate a per-message {{SecureRandom}} IV when 
> {{inlineInitVector}} is enabled instead of requiring a static one. Changing 
> key derivation or IV handling breaks compatibility with data produced by 
> earlier versions, so it needs an upgrade-guide entry and probably a version 
> marker in the output format.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to