[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-7259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13916667#comment-13916667
]
Aaron Whiteside commented on CAMEL-7259:
----------------------------------------
the same thing goes for ProducerTemplate.start(); if it's not called then you
can be interacting with a Producer that might not be setup correctly. The
ProducerTemplate should be invalid until start() is called.. perhaps throw an
exception?
> ProducerTemplate is not aligned with the lifecycle of CamelContext and
> therefore it's possible to have a Producer that's never shutdown correctly.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-7259
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-7259
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: camel-core
> Affects Versions: 2.12.3
> Reporter: Aaron Whiteside
>
> ProducerTemplate is not aligned with the lifecycle of CamelContext and
> therefore it's possible to have a Producer that's never shutdown correctly.
> {code}
> context.start();
> ProducerTemplate template = context.createProducerTemplate();
> template.sendBody("test://test", "Hello");
> context.stop();
> {code}
> If I never call template.stop() the Producer for the test component (or
> indeed any other component in it's place) will never receive a call to
> doStop. But the Endpoint that the Producer is associated with will be
> stopped.. which is a weird situation/state to be in..?
> context.stop() should cleanup any and all Producers, even those created by a
> ProducerTemplate.. after such time a ProducerTemplate should become invalid
> and perhaps throw an exception that the camel context has been shutdown?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)