[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-7521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Claus Ibsen reassigned CAMEL-7521:
----------------------------------

    Assignee: Claus Ibsen

> Provide an option for unsynchronized aggregation when splitter is streaming 
> and not parallel
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-7521
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-7521
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: camel-core
>    Affects Versions: 2.13.2
>            Reporter: Jerry Williamson
>            Assignee: Claus Ibsen
>             Fix For: 2.14.0
>
>         Attachments: SplitterSynchronizedAggregationTest.java, 
> camel.multicast.processor.patch
>
>
> We use a splitter route that splits very large files.
> The splits need to be aggregated in order.
> The splitter is therefore configured with streaming=true and 
> parallelProcessing=false.
> When there are multiple in-flight exchanges on the route (i.e. different 
> files are being processed) the end-to-end processing time for each file is 
> significantly impacted because each aggregation call is synchronized in 
> MulticastProcessor.doAggregate method..
> It is not uncommon, in our environment, to have thousands of splits per file 
> and the synchronization is significantly impacting the throughput of the 
> route.
> I propose that an option be added (to splitter at least) to allow for an 
> unsynchronized aggregation. The option would default to false for backward 
> compatibility and would possibly be ignored if parallelProcessing = true.
> The body of the MulticastProcess.doAggregate method could be moved to a new, 
> unsynchronized method (say doAggregateInternal). The 
> MulticastProcessor.doAggregate method could remain synchronized (again for 
> backward compatibility) but the body of that method would then call the new 
> unsynchronized doAggregateInternal method. In this way, existing code would 
> remain synchronized.
> The splitter, then, could call the unsynchronized doAggregateInternal method 
> when the unsynchronizedAggregation option was true.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to