[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-7787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14125383#comment-14125383
 ] 

Franz Forsthofer commented on CAMEL-7787:
-----------------------------------------

The problem that the cached stream has been deleted by a sub-route, does not 
only occur in the multi-cast or split case. Here is a simple test example which 
shows that:

public class StreamCacheInSubRouteTest extends ContextTestSupport {

    @Override
    protected RouteBuilder createRouteBuilder() throws Exception {
        return new RouteBuilder() {
            @Override
            public void configure() throws Exception {
                context.setStreamCaching(true);
                context.getStreamCachingStrategy().setEnabled(true);
                context.getStreamCachingStrategy().setSpoolDirectory(
                        "target/camel/cache");
                context.getStreamCachingStrategy().setSpoolThreshold(1l);

                from("direct:startError")
                        .to("direct:subroute").to("mock:result");

                from("direct:subroute") //
                        .process(new Processor() {
                            @Override
                            public void process(Exchange exchange) throws 
Exception {
                                 CachedOutputStream cos = new 
CachedOutputStream(exchange);
                                    String s = "Test Message 1";
                                    
cos.write(s.getBytes(Charset.forName("UTF-8")));
                                    cos.close();
                                    InputStream is = (InputStream) 
cos.newStreamCache();

                                    exchange.getOut().setBody(is);
                                
                            }
                        }) //
                        .to("mock:result_subroute");
            }

        };

    }

    @Test
    public void test() throws Exception {

        MockEndpoint mock = getMockEndpoint("mock:result");
        mock.expectedMessageCount(1);
        template.sendBody("direct:startError", "<start></start>");

        byte[] data = mock.getReceivedExchanges().get(0).getIn()
                .getBody(byte[].class);
        assertEquals("Test Message 1", new String(data, "UTF-8"));
    }

}

You can also find this test class attached.

> Multicast - Should defer UoW done until after the aggregate has been done
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-7787
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-7787
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: camel-core, eip
>            Reporter: Claus Ibsen
>            Assignee: Claus Ibsen
>             Fix For: 2.15.0
>
>
> See nabble
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Stream-Cache-spool-file-deletion-before-aggregation-in-Multicast-involving-huge-data-tp5756092.html
> In the multicast/splitter we should defer the UoW done to *after* the 
> aggregate has been called, as in the nabble example, the stream cache 
> overflow to disk would have deleted the file etc.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to