[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Claus Ibsen updated CAMEL-6180:
-------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: Future

> SJMS Component behavior suggestions to improve upon the standard JMS component
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-6180
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6180
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: camel-sjms
>            Reporter: Matt Pavlovich
>            Assignee: Scott England-Sullivan
>             Fix For: Future
>
>
> The SJMS component should not suffer any feature loss from the standard JMS 
> component, for best user experience in 3.0. 
> A random mix of suggested behavior changes/enhancements:
>  1. Supporting things like consume from multiple destinations using 
> wildcards... from jms:queue:US_TICKETS_*  
>  2. Support dynamic destination on a <to uri=".." by using the same header 
> from the existing JMS component. 
>       CamelJmsDestination     javax.jms.Destination    A destination object.
>       CamelJmsDestinationName String   The destination name.
>  3. I suggest making 'request-reply' be explicit, since implicit is really 
> painful for new users. The "magic" temp destination listener is not confusing 
> and the user has nothing in the route to go on as to why that is happening.
>  4. Along w/ #3, don't kill the QoS headers by default. It makes setting up 
> proxies really complicated. 
>  5. Support MQ Series 'weirdness' that current component handles.. see 
> 'Setting JMS provider options on the destination' here: 
> http://camel.apache.org/jms.html
> Thanks!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to