[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14323171#comment-14323171
]
Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-6065:
------------------------------------
Well basically sjms is too tight coupled with the endpoints in either InOnly or
InOut mode.
This would require a redesign on camel-sjms to support a more elastic mode at
runtime. Pushing this for future work.
> SJMS: inOut() in route and exchangePattern=InOut are not equivalent
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-6065
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6065
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: camel-sjms
> Affects Versions: 2.11.0
> Reporter: Harald Wellmann
> Assignee: Claus Ibsen
> Fix For: Future
>
> Attachments: CAMEL-6065.patch
>
>
> When tunneling a bean invocation through a JMS queue using SJMS, inOut() is
> not sufficient to specify the exchange pattern. "exchangePattern=InOut" must
> be added explicitly to the endpoint URI.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
