[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-8861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14582131#comment-14582131
]
Emilien commented on CAMEL-8861:
--------------------------------
And also an exemple of the corresponding camel context configuration :
<util:map id="websocketFactoryMap">
<entry key="default">
<bean
class="org.apache.camel.component.websocket.DefaultWebsocketFactory" />
</entry>
<entry key="myProtocol">
<bean id="mySocketFactory"
class="exemple.myprotocol.MySocketFactory"/>
</entry>
</util:map>
<bean id="websocket"
class="org.apache.camel.component.websocket.WebsocketComponent">
<property name="socketFactory" ref="websocketFactoryMap"/>
</bean>
> Add a factory to support custom websocket sub-protocol
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-8861
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-8861
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: camel-websocket
> Affects Versions: 2.16.0
> Reporter: Emilien
> Attachments: camel.patch
>
>
> Websocket support sub-protocol definition (see
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6455#section-1.9). However, there is no way to
> provide your own websocket implementation to handle your own subprotocol.
> Adding a configurable websocket factory to the component could enable this
> functionnality.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)