[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-8594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14620281#comment-14620281
]
Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-8594:
------------------------------------
Something for the future, eg post Camel 3.0. People should rely on Camel being
stable.
> Camel and ReactiveX/RxJava
> --------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-8594
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-8594
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: Wish
> Reporter: Jyrki Ruuskanen
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Future
>
>
> To me, ReactiveX and Camel looks like a perfect match. I'm wondering if all
> Camel routes could in future (Camel 3?) be based on RX?
> Camel would bring the components, front-ends and a variety of RX extensions,
> and routes/pipelines would be built as Observable<Exchange> sequences.
> This arrangement could greatly benefit both projects and simplify the Camel
> codebase as well.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
