Bob Blackard created CAMEL-9066:
-----------------------------------
Summary: Include any headers unmarshalled by SoapJaxbDataFormat in
content marshalled by the same.
Key: CAMEL-9066
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-9066
Project: Camel
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: camel-soap
Affects Versions: 2.12.5, 2.16.0, 2.15.3, 2.14.4, Future, 2.16
Environment: Any
Reporter: Bob Blackard
Fix For: 2.16.0, 2.15.3, 2.14.4, Future, 2.16
The current implementation of the Soap11DataFormatAdapter and
Soap12DataFormatAdapter will never generate SOAP Headers when a JAXB object is
the inputObject.
If the unmarshal is done with ignoreUnmarshalledHeaders set to false, then the
SoapJaxbDataFormat.SOAP_UNMARSHALLED_HEADER_LIST message header is populated
with a list of Objects or JAXBElement<?>s. However, during the doMarshal, this
message header is never referenced. Therefore, the sequence:
from("direct:source").unmarshal(fromSoapDataFormat).process(doSomething).marshal(toSoapDataFormat).to("mock:end");
will never produce SOAP Headers in the outbound document.
The doUnmarshal passes the inputObject and an empty List<JAXBElement<?>> into
createContentFromObject. However, is the inputObject is an ordinary JAXB
object (or JAXBElement<?>) then no header content will be created, and since
the Exchange isn't sent to createContentFromObject, the
SoapJaxbDataFormat.SOAP_UNMARSHALLED_HEADER_LIST cannot be referenced.
It seems to me that, if ignoreUnmarshalledHeaders is false, and the
SoapJaxbDataFormat.SOAP_UNMARSHALLED_HEADER_LIST is non-empty, and in the event
the inbound Exchange does not contain an Exception, then the contents of the
SoapJaxbDataFormat.SOAP_UNMARSHALLED_HEADER_LIST should be added to the
headerContent before the call to createContentFromObject.
I have checked the code for SoapJaxbDataFormat, Soap11DataFormatAdapter and
Soap12DataFormatAdapter from camel-soap 2.12.0 through 2.15.2 and it looks like
these three classes haven't changed.
I crated a demo project and patch, originally against JBoss Fuse 6.1.0, but
offer it here for the camel-soap 2.12.x branch. I have also applied and tested
the patch against camel-soap in the master branch (2.16-SNAPSHOT). Indeed, it
looks like this patch can be applied from any point 2.12 and forward.
The demo can be run against 2.12.5 (or any released version - just change the
camel.version property in the POM) to demonstrate what I think is the failure.
It can also be run against a patched 2.12.6-SNAPSHOT or 2.16-SNAPSHOT (again,
just play around with the camel.version property) to demonstrate what I think
is correct behavior.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)