[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-8302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15000926#comment-15000926
]
David Williams commented on CAMEL-8302:
---------------------------------------
I have created a PR implementing the logic suggested in the original
description. I took this approach rather than the one suggested above (setting
the queue to null) to avoid backwards compatibility issues for those who may be
relying on the random integer queues.
> Rabbitmq shouldn't require/bind queue if not specified
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-8302
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-8302
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: camel-rabbitmq
> Affects Versions: 2.14.1
> Reporter: Sajjad Akhter
> Fix For: Future
>
>
> Current implementation is declaring both exchange and queue on any init
> (producer or consumer). In case of producer one don't need queue and may not
> know who going to be client.
> We can add flag skipQueueDeclare so that it won't genrate uuid queue.
> i can provide PR if it helps.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)