[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-9498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15136343#comment-15136343
]
Jyrki Ruuskanen commented on CAMEL-9498:
----------------------------------------
Claus et al, I'd really appreciate some feedback on this PR.
> Always provide a writable local registry
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-9498
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-9498
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: camel-core
> Reporter: Jyrki Ruuskanen
> Priority: Minor
>
> Many Camel components need to reference objects in CamelContext's registry as
> part of their configuration (for example httpClientConfigurer for http/http4
> and restletRealm for restlet).
> These objects often apply to that particular CamelContext and not others,
> thus the registry holding these bits could be local instead of, say, OSGi
> service registry. Using a local registry prevents the risk of conflicting
> keys and spares us from devising a naming policy for even trivial stuff.
> To conveniently create and add these objects, even from inside RouteBuilder's
> configure method, we need write access to said registry.
> CamelContext should, in my opinion, provide a local SimpleRegistry that is
> always available.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
