[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-10879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15878222#comment-15878222
]
Ralf Steppacher edited comment on CAMEL-10879 at 2/22/17 1:40 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------
So what about the first suggestion? Camel core comes with a thread-safe
implementation built in, and the integrator can choose between thread safe or
not by means of a route attribute? Or something alike?
was (Author: ralfsteppacher):
So what about the first suggestion. Camel core comes with a thread-safe
implementation built in, and the integrator can choose between thread safe or
not by means of a route attribute? Or something alike?
> Add option for thread safe Exchange implementation
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-10879
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-10879
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: camel-core
> Affects Versions: 2.18.2
> Reporter: Ralf Steppacher
>
> The current implementation of the {{org.apache.camel.Exchange}} is not thread
> safe. For routes that employ custom, multi-threaded processors with
> concurrent access to the exchange, it would be beneficial to be able to
> request a thread-safe exchange implementation.
> OR
> A factory mechanism that would allow 3rd parties to contribute an
> implementation of the exchange interface that suits their specific needs.
> Thread safety or other. (For this, the current implementation of
> {{DefaultExchange}} should be reviewed and optimized for sub-classing.)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
