[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-11683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16155470#comment-16155470
]
Keegan Witt commented on CAMEL-11683:
-------------------------------------
You don't want to change this to an enhancement instead of bug for allowing
bean references in {{process()}}?
> Allow bean references in to() URI
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-11683
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-11683
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: camel-core
> Affects Versions: 2.19.1
> Reporter: Keegan Witt
> Assignee: Claus Ibsen
>
> As a workaround to CAMEL-11528, we tried replacing something like
> {code:java}
> from("direct:start")
> .wireTap("bean:tap")
> .to("mock:result");
> {code}
>
> with
> {code:java}
> from("direct:start")
> .wiretap("direct:tap")
> .to("mock:result");
> from("direct:tap")
> .process("bean:tapper");
> {code}
> We got
> {noformat}Caused by: org.apache.camel.FailedToCreateRouteException: Failed to
> create route route190 at: >>> process[ref:bean:tapper] <<< in route:
> Route(route190)[[From[direct:tap]] -> [OnException[[clas... because of No
> bean could be found in the registry for: bean:tapper of type:
> org.apache.camel.Processor{noformat}
> But if we did
> {code:java}
> public class MyRoute extends RouteBuilder {
> @Resource Tapper tapper;
> public void configure() throws Exception {
> from("direct:start")
> .wiretap("direct:tap")
> .to("mock:result");
> from("direct:tap")
> .process(tapper);
> }
> }
> @Component
> public class Tapper implements Processor {
> public void Process(Exchange exchange) {}
> }
> {code}
> It worked.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
