[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-11888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16471622#comment-16471622
]
Andrea Tarocchi edited comment on CAMEL-11888 at 5/11/18 8:42 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi [~lb], an implementation based on JGroups views would suffer the same
limitations as the one based on JGroups Locks (i.e. not enforcing only one
master in case of split brain);
an implementation based on jgroups-raft would be more interesting in that
regards adding a new option for the users to cope with spilt-brains situations.
I'd love to implement it fi you are looking for volunteers.
was (Author: valdar):
Hi [~lb], an implementation based on JGroups views would suffer the same
limitations as the one based on JGroups Locks (i.e. not enforcing only one
master in case of split brain);
an implementation based on jgroups-raft would be more interesting in that
regards adding an new option for the users to cope with spilt-brains situations.
I'd love to implement it fi you are looking for volunteers.
> cluster service : add a cluster service based on JGroups Raft
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-11888
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-11888
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: camel-jgroups
> Reporter: Luca Burgazzoli
> Assignee: Andrea Tarocchi
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: clustering
> Fix For: 2.22.0
>
>
> See http://belaban.github.io/jgroups-raft/
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
