Ryan Yeats created CAMEL-14033:
----------------------------------

             Summary: multiple consumers for namedReplyTo results in a cryptic 
nullPointer
                 Key: CAMEL-14033
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-14033
             Project: Camel
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: camel-sjms
    Affects Versions: 3.0.0.RC1
            Reporter: Ryan Yeats


Per 
[https://camel.apache.org/components/latest/sjms-component.html#_clustering] 
you should not have multiple inOut producerEndpoints using the same replyTo 
address but if you do it results in a cryptic null pointer exception it would 
be nice to have a better error message of some sort directing you to use a 
unique replyTo address or temporary queue. Additionally if the replyTo is a 
topic then I don't believe it should result in an error and it may be better to 
actually use a message selector for this case.

java.lang.NullPointerException: nulljava.lang.NullPointerException: null at 
org.apache.camel.component.sjms.producer.InOutProducer$MessageConsumerResourcesFactory$1.onMessage(InOutProducer.java:103)
 ~[?:?] at 
org.apache.activemq.artemis.jms.client.JMSMessageListenerWrapper.onMessage(JMSMessageListenerWrapper.java:110)
 ~[254:org.apache.activemq.artemis-server-osgi:2.8.1] at 
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.client.impl.ClientConsumerImpl.callOnMessage(ClientConsumerImpl.java:1031)
 ~[?:?] at 
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.client.impl.ClientConsumerImpl.access$400(ClientConsumerImpl.java:50)
 ~[?:?] at 
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.client.impl.ClientConsumerImpl$Runner.run(ClientConsumerImpl.java:1154)
 ~[?:?] at 
org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.actors.OrderedExecutor.doTask(OrderedExecutor.java:42)
 ~[?:?] at 
org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.actors.OrderedExecutor.doTask(OrderedExecutor.java:31)
 ~[?:?] at 
org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.actors.ProcessorBase.executePendingTasks(ProcessorBase.java:66)
 ~[?:?] at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149) 
[?:?] at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624) 
[?:?]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to