[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-14910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17116471#comment-17116471
 ] 

Aemie commented on CAMEL-14910:
-------------------------------

I have observed that there are various related components including AWS2, AWS, 
Hazelnut, Spring, and various others as well & listing all on the nav panel 
creates messiness, entropy & redundancy. However, I also observed that are few 
components including Hazelnut that describe the summary of its related 
component. Hence, I thought we could achieve this by bundling all related 
components in their parent unit as shown below and the indentation would be 
similar to as shown in the example.

!getting-started.png|width=159,height=72!   We could perform the bundling as 
similar to this.

 

All the AWS related components listed as it creates high entropy and makes 
searching for a user quite heavy job.

!aws2.png!  

> Decide if component summary pages are a good idea
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-14910
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-14910
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: website
>    Affects Versions: 3.2.0
>            Reporter: David Jencks
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: aws2.png, getting-started.png
>
>
> I discovered some component summary pages while working on CAMEL-14874
> and included them in the nav pane and index table.  Claus suggested that the 
> Spring one was useful and the others should be dropped.  The Kubernetes 
> summary page is heavily linked back and forth to the individual Kubernetes 
> components.
>  
> In general, due to the extremely long components list, I'm inclined to think 
> that any possible kind of grouping is a good idea. If there are going to be 
> summary pages, then they should all be similar in some way.
>  * Should there be summary pages for groups of related components?
>  * What should their structure and appearance be?
>  * Should the nav pane indent the components in a group?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to