[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-15518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17193081#comment-17193081
 ] 

Luca Burgazzoli commented on CAMEL-15518:
-----------------------------------------

Yeah, wonder if we can add a parameter to the @Configurer to set the name of 
the configurer

{code:java}
@Configurer("org.apache.camel.ExtendedCamelContext")
org.apache.camel.impl.ExtendedCamelContext {
}
{code}

if not provided, the name of the class is used

> Wong service generated for the ExtendedCamelContext
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-15518
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-15518
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: camel-core
>            Reporter: Luca Burgazzoli
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.6.0
>
>
> The name of the configurer for the the ExtendedCamelContext is wrong as it 
> uses the FQCN of the implementation class 
> (org.apache.camel.impl.ExtendedCamelContext) instead of the interface one 
> (org.apache.camel.ExtendedCamelContext).
> Maybe the @Configurer annotation should allow to set the name of the factory 
> file.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to