Jens Kleine-Herzbruch created CAMEL-16566:
---------------------------------------------

             Summary: Nested enrich with shareUnitOfWork=true result in 
ConcurrentModificationException
                 Key: CAMEL-16566
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-16566
             Project: Camel
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: came-core
    Affects Versions: 3.7.3
            Reporter: Jens Kleine-Herzbruch


If you have routes that have nested enrichers that use shareUnitOfWork=true, 
you'll get a ConcurrentModificationException when the subroutes are joined back.

 
{code:java}
from("direct:routeA").
    enrichWith("direct:routeB", true, true).body((a, b) -> a);

from("direct:routeB").
    enrichWith("direct:routeC", true, true).body((a, b) -> a);

from("direct:routeC").setBody(constant("xxx")); {code}
 
{code:java}
org.apache.camel.CamelExchangeException: Error occurred during aggregation. 
Exchange[0A01B3DD98090F3-0000000000000001]. Caused by: 
[java.util.ConcurrentModificationException - null]
 at org.apache.camel.processor.Enricher$1.done(Enricher.java:247) 
~[camel-core-processor-3.7.3.jar:3.7.3]
 at org.apache.camel.AsyncCallback.run(AsyncCallback.java:44) 
~[camel-api-3.7.3.jar:3.7.3]
 ...
Caused by: java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
 at java.util.ArrayList$Itr.checkForComodification(ArrayList.java:1042) ~[?:?]
 at java.util.ArrayList$Itr.remove(ArrayList.java:1010) ~[?:?]
 at 
org.apache.camel.impl.engine.DefaultUnitOfWork.handoverSynchronization(DefaultUnitOfWork.java:202)
 ~[camel-base-engine-3.7.3.jar:3.7.3]
 at 
org.apache.camel.impl.engine.DefaultUnitOfWork.handoverSynchronization(DefaultUnitOfWork.java:179)
 ~[camel-base-engine-3.7.3.jar:3.7.3]
 at 
org.apache.camel.support.DefaultExchange.handoverCompletions(DefaultExchange.java:612)
 ~[camel-support-3.7.3.jar:3.7.3]
 at org.apache.camel.processor.Enricher$1.done(Enricher.java:242) 
~[camel-core-processor-3.7.3.jar:3.7.3]
 ... {code}
 

 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to