[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-17337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Claus Ibsen resolved CAMEL-17337.
---------------------------------
    Resolution: Fixed

> camel-fhir - FhirComponent regression between 2.2x and 3.x releases
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-17337
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-17337
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: camel-fhir
>    Affects Versions: 3.x
>            Reporter: Paul Coombes
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.15.0
>
>
> In the 3.x branches, the FhirComponent contains a FhirConfiguration property 
> which results in the getClient method creating a new IGenericClient from the 
> method supplied configuration due to the configuration property never being 
> initialised.
> {code:java}
> @Component("fhir")
> public class FhirComponent extends AbstractApiComponent<FhirApiName, 
> FhirConfiguration, FhirApiCollection> {
>     @Metadata(label = "advanced")
>     FhirConfiguration configuration;
> {code}
> This property appears to shadow a property of the same name on 
> AbstractApiComponent
> {code:java}
> public abstract class AbstractApiComponent<E extends Enum<E> & ApiName, T, S 
> extends ApiCollection<E, T>>
>         extends DefaultComponent {
>     @Metadata(label = "advanced", description = "Component configuration")
>     protected T configuration;
> {code}
> This is an issue for me as I am attempting to register a IClientInterceptor 
> to help with a SMART on FHIR workflow, which no longer works as the 
> configuration supplied during class construction is ignored and a 
> IGenericClient is never persisted.
> To work around the issue in the interim, creating a component that extends 
> FhirComponent, overriding the getClient method to utilise the configuration 
> from AbstractApiComponent appears to resolve the issue.
> Assuming I'm not missing anything obvious regarding the purpose for the 
> configuration property on the FhirComponent class, and if desired, am more 
> than happy to submit a PR with a fix.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to