[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-18783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lukas Lowinger updated CAMEL-18783:
-----------------------------------
Description:
Having one `cxf:bean:soapClientEndpoint` (with Singleton scope) and following
two routes
{code}
from("direct:simpleUriBean")
.to("cxf:bean:soapClientEndpoint?dataFormat=PAYLOAD");
from("direct:operandsAdd")
.to("cxf:bean:soapClientEndpoint?dataFormat=POJO");
{code}
Leads to situation, that invoking route via `direct:simpleUriBean` will use
`dataFormat=POJO` instead of PAYLOAD (which reader of that code could expect).
Could we somehow detect those misuses ?
was:
Having one `cxf:bean:soapClientEndpoint` (with Singleton scope) and following
two routes
{code}
from("direct:simpleUriBean")
.toD("cxf:bean:soapClientEndpoint?dataFormat=PAYLOAD");
from("direct:operandsAdd")
.to("cxf:bean:soapClientEndpoint?dataFormat=POJO");
{code}
Leads to situation, that invoking route via `direct:simpleUriBean` will use
`dataFormat=POJO` instead of PAYLOAD (which reader of that code could expect).
Could we somehow detect those misuses ?
> Detect unused URI options in route definition
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-18783
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-18783
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: camel-cxf
> Affects Versions: 3.18.3
> Reporter: Lukas Lowinger
> Priority: Major
>
> Having one `cxf:bean:soapClientEndpoint` (with Singleton scope) and following
> two routes
> {code}
> from("direct:simpleUriBean")
> .to("cxf:bean:soapClientEndpoint?dataFormat=PAYLOAD");
> from("direct:operandsAdd")
> .to("cxf:bean:soapClientEndpoint?dataFormat=POJO");
> {code}
> Leads to situation, that invoking route via `direct:simpleUriBean` will use
> `dataFormat=POJO` instead of PAYLOAD (which reader of that code could
> expect). Could we somehow detect those misuses ?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
