[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-19056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Otavio Rodolfo Piske updated CAMEL-19056:
-----------------------------------------
Description:
After we finish streamlining the extensions interface on the
{{{}CamelContext{}}}, we can evaluate creating a fluent interface API for
building contexts. Therefore, we could try to separate the context
configuration from the instantiation and provide the context configuration that
is suitable for the user / scenario.
For instance, today users have to do something like this:
{code:java}
CamelContext context = new DefaultContext();
context.setName("something");
context.setDescription("another thing");
// an so on.
{code}
In concrete terms, we could investigate modifying the configuration to look
like this:
{code:java}
CamelContext context = ContextConfigurationBuilder
.newDefaultConfiguration()
.withName("something")
.withDescription("another thing")
.build()
// No need for setters on the context -> make it immutable
{code}
We can also provide configurationBuilders for scenarios where immutability is
undesired as well as allowing the build of contexts with the older API for
users converting to 4.x
{code:java}
ContextConfigurationBuilder
.newDefaultConfiguration()
.withName("something")
.withDescription("another thing")
.buildLegacy()
{code}
The main goal is to:
1. Allow the creation of contexts that are truly immutable
2. Simplify removing / abstracting runtime configuration that may not be needed
in some cases (thus helping keeping the context lightweight for Quarkus, Camel
K and other scenarios)
was:
After we finish streamlining the extensions interface on the
{{{}CamelContext{}}}, we can evaluate creating a fluent interface API for
building contexts. Therefore, we could try to separate the context
configuration from the instantiation and provide the context configuration that
is suitable for the user / scenario.
For instance, today users have to do something like this:
{code:java}
CamelContext context = new DefaultContext();
context.setName("something");
context.setDescription("another thing");
// an so on.
{code}
In concrete terms, we could investigate modifying the configuration of the
{code:java}
CamelContext context = ContextConfigurationBuilder
.newDefaultConfiguration()
.withName("something")
.withDescription("another thing")
.build()
// No need for setters on the context -> make it immutable
{code}
We can also provide configurationBuilders for scenarios where immutability is
undesired as well as allowing the build of contexts with the older API for
users converting to 4.x
{code:java}
ContextConfigurationBuilder
.newDefaultConfiguration()
.withName("something")
.withDescription("another thing")
.buildLegacy()
{code}
> Evaluate implementing a fluent context builder
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-19056
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-19056
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: camel-core
> Reporter: Otavio Rodolfo Piske
> Priority: Major
>
> After we finish streamlining the extensions interface on the
> {{{}CamelContext{}}}, we can evaluate creating a fluent interface API for
> building contexts. Therefore, we could try to separate the context
> configuration from the instantiation and provide the context configuration
> that is suitable for the user / scenario.
> For instance, today users have to do something like this:
> {code:java}
> CamelContext context = new DefaultContext();
>
> context.setName("something");
> context.setDescription("another thing");
> // an so on.
> {code}
>
> In concrete terms, we could investigate modifying the configuration to look
> like this:
> {code:java}
> CamelContext context = ContextConfigurationBuilder
> .newDefaultConfiguration()
> .withName("something")
> .withDescription("another thing")
> .build()
>
> // No need for setters on the context -> make it immutable
> {code}
>
> We can also provide configurationBuilders for scenarios where immutability is
> undesired as well as allowing the build of contexts with the older API for
> users converting to 4.x
> {code:java}
>
> ContextConfigurationBuilder
> .newDefaultConfiguration()
> .withName("something")
> .withDescription("another thing")
> .buildLegacy()
> {code}
>
> The main goal is to:
> 1. Allow the creation of contexts that are truly immutable
> 2. Simplify removing / abstracting runtime configuration that may not be
> needed in some cases (thus helping keeping the context lightweight for
> Quarkus, Camel K and other scenarios)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
