[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-19096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Claus Ibsen updated CAMEL-19096:
--------------------------------
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug)
> EhcacheAggregationRepository drops messages on OversizeMappingException
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-19096
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-19096
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: camel-ehcache
> Affects Versions: 3.14.7
> Reporter: Pieter Callewaert
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: aggregation-investigation.zip
>
>
> When using an EhCacheAggregationRepository with an offheap store and the
> aggregated exchange becomes too large, the cache entry is cleared,
> effectively loosing exchanges.
> Have a route that aggregates string message bodies by aggregating them by
> concatinating the messages. The aggregation is completed per 100 messages or
> 5 minutes. The aggregationRepository has a disk backed store.
> When the aggregated exchange becomes to large, EhCache throws an
> {code:java}
> o.e.i.i.r.RobustResilienceStrategy - Ehcache key true recovered from
> org.ehcache.spi.resilience.StoreAccessException: The element with key 'true'
> is too large to be stored in this offheap store.
> at
> org.ehcache.impl.internal.store.offheap.AbstractOffHeapStore.computeWithRetry(AbstractOffHeapStore.java:1038)
> at
> org.ehcache.impl.internal.store.offheap.AbstractOffHeapStore.put(AbstractOffHeapStore.java:250)
> at
> org.ehcache.impl.internal.store.tiering.TieredStore.put(TieredStore.java:108)
> {code}
> after this call the entry in the cache is removed, effectively loosing
> messages.
> {code:java}
> cacheManager.createCache("cacheName", CacheConfigurationBuilder
> .newCacheConfigurationBuilder(String.class,
> DefaultExchangeHolder.class,
> ResourcePoolsBuilder.newResourcePoolsBuilder()
> .heap(1000, EntryUnit.ENTRIES)
> .disk(1, MemoryUnit.MB, true))
> .withExpiry(ExpiryPolicyBuilder.noExpiration()));{code}
> Attached is a project demonstrating the behaviour. As a reference there is
> also a variant with LevelDb which behaves as expected.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)