[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-19392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17726533#comment-17726533
]
Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-19392:
-------------------------------------
Is this already corrected on v4
> Correct template bean definition schema
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-19392
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-19392
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: camel-yaml-dsl
> Affects Versions: 3.x
> Reporter: Tomohisa Igarashi
> Assignee: Tomohisa Igarashi
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.21.0
>
>
> The template bean, which is used by Kamelet, is out of sync between schema
> and actually used deserializer/definition
> https://github.com/apache/camel/blob/camel-3.x/dsl/camel-yaml-dsl/camel-yaml-dsl-deserializers/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/dsl/yaml/deserializers/RouteTemplateDefinitionDeserializer.java#L48
> https://github.com/apache/camel/blob/camel-3.x/dsl/camel-yaml-dsl/camel-yaml-dsl-deserializers/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/dsl/yaml/deserializers/RouteTemplateDefinitionDeserializer.java#L88
> NamedBeanDefinition supports
> {noformat}
> properties:
> propName: propValue
> objProp:
> objPropProp: objPropPropVal
> {noformat}
> But the template bean actually supports following
> {noformat}
> property:
> - key: propName
> value: propValue
> {noformat}
> and
> {noformat}
> properties:
> propName: propValue
> {noformat}
> In order to reflect the actual behavior in YAML DSL JSON schema, we need to
> change from `NamedBeanDefinition` to `RouteTemplateBeanDefinition` and
> `TemplatedRouteBeanDefinition` in the annotation.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
