GitHub user xuchuanyin opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2817

    [CARBONDATA-3009] Move method for mergeIndex to correct the place

    Currently the entry point of function for mergeIndex is in `CommonUtil`
    which is not proper. Here in this commit, we will move this to the right
    place.
    
    Be sure to do all of the following checklist to help us incorporate 
    your contribution quickly and easily:
    
     - [x] Any interfaces changed?
     `only internal interface has been changed`
     - [x] Any backward compatibility impacted?
     `NO`
     - [x] Document update required?
    `NO`
     - [x] Testing done
            Please provide details on 
            - Whether new unit test cases have been added or why no new tests 
are required?
    `Not required. We just moved the method from one place to another`
            - How it is tested? Please attach test report.
    `Tested in local`
            - Is it a performance related change? Please attach the performance 
test report.
    `NO`
            - Any additional information to help reviewers in testing this 
change.
    `We should provide the interfaces and functions in proper place and avoid 
god-class`
           
     - [x] For large changes, please consider breaking it into sub-tasks under 
an umbrella JIRA. 
    `NA`
    


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/xuchuanyin/carbondata 
181016_opt_merge_index_method

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2817.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #2817
    
----
commit 1d1f6ad61d1a44f5cf78dac659f90347fe4f1a0c
Author: xuchuanyin <xuchuanyin@...>
Date:   2018-10-16T06:57:16Z

    Move method for mergeIndex to correct the place
    
    Currently the entry point of function for mergeIndex is in `CommonUtil`
    which is not proper. Here in this commit, we will move this to the right
    place.

----


---

Reply via email to