ravipesala commented on a change in pull request #3856:
URL: https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/3856#discussion_r475560861
##########
File path:
integration/spark/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/mutation/merge/CarbonMergeDataSetCommand.scala
##########
@@ -194,29 +210,32 @@ case class CarbonMergeDataSetCommand(
tuple._2.asJava)
}
}
- Some(UpdateTableModel(true, trxMgr.getLatestTrx,
- executorErrors, tuple._2, true))
+ Some(UpdateTableModel(isUpdate = true, trxMgr.getLatestTrx,
+ executorErrors, tuple._2, loadAsNewSegment = true))
} else {
None
}
- CarbonInsertIntoWithDf(
- databaseNameOp = Some(carbonTable.getDatabaseName),
+ val dataFrame = loadDF.select(tableCols.map(col): _*)
+ CarbonInsertIntoCommand(databaseNameOp = Some(carbonTable.getDatabaseName),
tableName = carbonTable.getTableName,
- options = Map("fileheader" -> header, "sort_scope" -> "nosort"),
+ options = Map("fileheader" -> header, "sort_scope" -> "no_sort"),
Review comment:
I agree with @ajantha-bhat we should use the target table sort scope.
But this PR is only about performance we can cover this change in another PR
with proper test
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
