[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13640135#comment-13640135
]
Kiran Koneti commented on CLOUDSTACK-2167:
------------------------------------------
The API output is follows:
<listphysicalnetworksresponse
cloud-stack-version="4.2.0-SNAPSHOT"><count>1</count><physicalnetwork><id>b1dff739-f682-4678-a526-53bd9e4ce086</id><name>Physical
Network
1</name><broadcastdomainrange>ZONE</broadcastdomainrange><zoneid>4f893d67-c334-4087-923c-fe0e7db17836</zoneid><state>Enabled</state><vlan>921-924;936-940;930-934</vlan><isolationmethods>VLAN</isolationmethods></physicalnetwork></listphysicalnetworksresponse>
Here the range 930-934 comes after the 936-940.Instead if it comes as 930-934
and then 936-940 then it would make more sense.
> The Vlan ranges displayed are not in asscending order.
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-2167
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2167
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Components: API
> Affects Versions: 4.2.0
> Reporter: Kiran Koneti
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.2.0
>
>
> When multiple vlan ranges are added to a physical networks the vlan ranges
> displayed in the output f the listPhysicalNetworks api displays the vlan
> range in randaom order,Instead if they are displayed in the ascending order
> range this would make it easy for the end user.
> This an Enhancement request.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
