[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Mitchell Klijnstra updated CLOUDSTACK-3975:
-------------------------------------------

    Description: 
Currently it is possible when calling the CS API to associate a new 
yet-to-create volume to an account using the account name. This would of course 
work but is in my opinion not as strict as having the ability to use a account' 
UUID instead. This would make sure that the disk is never created under a 
different account then was intended.

It seems logically to me to also allow UUID's as this seems to be the general 
practise on the API as a whole. Consistency being key.

  was:
Currently it is possible when calling the CS API to associate a new 
yet-to-create volume to a account using the account name. This would of course 
work but is in my opinion not as strict as having the ability to use a account' 
UUID instead. This would make sure that the disk is never created under a 
different account then was intended.

It seems logically to me to also allow UUID's as this seems to be the general 
practise on the API as a whole. Consistency being key.

    
> createVolume using accountid
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-3975
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3975
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>          Components: API
>    Affects Versions: 4.1.0
>         Environment: Any environment
>            Reporter: Mitchell Klijnstra
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: API
>
> Currently it is possible when calling the CS API to associate a new 
> yet-to-create volume to an account using the account name. This would of 
> course work but is in my opinion not as strict as having the ability to use a 
> account' UUID instead. This would make sure that the disk is never created 
> under a different account then was intended.
> It seems logically to me to also allow UUID's as this seems to be the general 
> practise on the API as a whole. Consistency being key.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to