Thomas O'Dowd created CLOUDSTACK-4103:
-----------------------------------------
Summary: S3 reduced redundancy option should be per s3 resource
and not a global setting.
Key: CLOUDSTACK-4103
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4103
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Anyone can view this level - this is the default.)
Affects Versions: 4.2.0
Reporter: Thomas O'Dowd
Issue 3028 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3028) added a
global option to control the setting of reduced redundancy (s3.rrs.enable). The
default of the option is false.
The reduced redundancy is normally an object level setting on S3 storage. For
example, snapshots could be uploaded using reduced redundancy storage while
templates are stored on normal storage. Currently we put everything in one
bucket. Different S3 servers/buckets can also be added. The reduced redundancy
could be configured as per bucket so that different objects going to that
bucket can take up less storage resources. Eventually, we could also have
configuration to split different types of objects out to different buckets but
that needs more thought.
John also mentioned in 3028:
I don't feel that a global option is the correct functionality. In my
opinion,
it should be a flag on the object store instance.
In general, I think we should employ global options sparingly due to
their
broad impact and the complexity they add to the operation of the system.
This likely won't be done for 4.2 so I'm going to mark 3028 as closed as it
solves the original issue where reduced redundancy was always being selected.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
