[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14679848#comment-14679848
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-8687:
--------------------------------------------
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/635#discussion_r36613344
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/template/PrepareTemplateCmd.java
---
@@ -60,6 +61,15 @@
description = "template ID of the template to be prepared
in primary storage(s).")
private Long templateId;
+ @ACL(accessType = AccessType.OperateEntry)
+ @Parameter(name = ApiConstants.STORAGE_ID,
+ type = CommandType.UUID,
+ entityType = StoragePoolResponse.class,
+ required = false,
+ description = "storage pool ID of the primary storage pool to
which the template should be prepared. If it is not provided the template" +
+ " is prepared on all the available primary storage
pools.")
+ private Long storageId;
--- End diff --
@remibergsma, @kishankavala is concurring with the observation by @devdeep
that his call was good in the name of consistency. I think he was being
unconditional about his LGTM.
> Update prepare template api to seed/prepare a template only on a give primary
> storage
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-8687
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8687
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Reporter: Devdeep Singh
> Assignee: Devdeep Singh
> Original Estimate: 2h
> Remaining Estimate: 2h
>
> Currently, the prepare template api will seed/prepare a given template on all
> the primary storage pools in a zone. If however, a user wishes to prepare a
> template only a particular storage pool, it isn't possible.
> The prepare template api should be updated to allow seedng/preparing a
> template only on a given primary storage pool.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)