[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14723507#comment-14723507
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-8781:
--------------------------------------------

Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/756#issuecomment-136397028
  
    Hi @nlivens ,
    
    I'm looking int your PR and also and some documentation of Cloudstack 4.2 
related to Netscaler as external load balancer for VPCs:
    
    The implementation was done in this issue: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-869
    
    The documentation can be found here: 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/FS+%3A+Support+of+Netscaler+as+External+LoadBalancing+Provider+in+VPC
    
    And if it should be removed, I believe it wouldn't be only about the 
Netscaler option, but also the offering - as showed in the image below:
    
    
![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/5129209/9581609/ba0891d8-5000-11e5-930d-6973b74b9aca.png)
    
    So, unless I misunderstood something, this PR should not be applied.
    
    @bhaisaab @remibergsma @DaanHoogland could one of you please give some 
thought on this PR and on what I wrote?
    
    Cheers,
    Wilder


> Superfluous field during VPC creation
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-8781
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8781
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>          Components: UI
>    Affects Versions: 4.6.0
>            Reporter: Nick Livens
>            Assignee: Nick Livens
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: 4.6.0
>
>         Attachments: addVpc.png
>
>
> When creating a VPC, there is a superfluous field "Public Load Balancer 
> Provider" which is being ignored since the LB Provider is specified in the 
> VPC offering. This might confuse the users whether they can use a different 
> LB provider than the one specified in the VPC offering.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to