[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14731238#comment-14731238
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-8750:
--------------------------------------------
GitHub user rafaelweingartner opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/778
Jira ticket CLOUDSTACK-8750
Re-pushing PR 714 (https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/714). We had
forgotten a class behind which generated a blocker issue on master (my bad,
sorry the trouble). Therefore, it had to be reverted. This PR is meant to
reintroduce the changes that were coded there (PR 714). This way we can close
the Jira ticket: CLOUDSTACK-8750.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/rafaelweingartner/cloudstack
master-lrg-cs-hackday-003
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/778.patch
To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:
This closes #778
----
commit 8a83968d5ec8cfa4c75251021cf48a72e01ed7c7
Author: Rafael Weingartner <[email protected]>
Date: 2015-09-04T18:33:20Z
Jira ticket CLOUDSTACK-8750
Re-pushing the PR 714, we had forgotten a class behind and it had to be
reverted.
----
> Change the variable s_logger to non-static and fixed its name in
> “com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentLifecycleBase” and its subclasses
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-8750
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8750
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Components: Management Server
> Reporter: pedro henrique pereira martins
> Assignee: pedro henrique pereira martins
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Future
>
> Original Estimate: 48h
> Remaining Estimate: 48h
>
> We have noticed that every single class that is a subclass of
> “ComponentLifecycleBase” instantiate their on “logger” manually and uses a
> nonstandard name. We fixed that by changing the variable in
> “ComponentLifecycleBase” to protected and non-static and instantiated it
> using the method “getClass” from Object class. Therefore, we can reduce the
> code in a few hundred lines and use a more intuitive name for the logger
> variable.
> We do understand that “s_ something“ is a proper way to instantiate a static
> variable in ACS classes. However, in few of the subclasses of
> “com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentLifecycleBase” it was used names such as
> “LOGGER” (that is a proper name for static field as JAVA standards), log,
> status_logger and others.
> What we propose is to change the logger variable in
> “com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentLifecycleBase” to protected and remove
> its static and final declaration. Therefore we did the following in
> ComponentLifecycleBase:
> protected Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(getClass());
> This way, every single subclass of ComponentLifecycleBase, when
> instantiated would automatically have a logger instance for its proper class
> ready to be used.
> During that process we found a static method in class that used the
> “s_logger” variable in classes:
> com.cloud.network.element.VirtualRouterElement
> org.apache.cloudstack.network.element.InternalLoadBalancerElement
> To fix that we proposed to create a new class
> “com.cloud.network.element.HAProxyLBRule”, instantiate it with @Componente
> and inject into the aforementioned classes.
> That class will contain the following methods extracted from
> com.cloud.network.element.VirtualRouterElement class:
> com.cloud.network.element.HAProxyLBRule.containsOnlyNumbers(String, String)
> com.cloud.network.element.HAProxyLBRule.validateHAProxyLBRule(LoadBalancingRule)
> However we don't know if all analyzed classes are singletons, if some of
> analyzed classes aren't singletons. Therefore that change could have an
> impact on memory consumption. It will require a deeper analysis to check
> which classes are singleton or not and leave the “logger” as static in such
> classes.
> We have a solution at our own branch
> https://github.com/rafaelweingartner/cloudstack/tree/master-lrg-cs-hackday-003
> However, there is still the need to double-check the singleton problem.
> There is a PR we created in our first attempt to solve that problem:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/714
> The dev that starts working on this ticket can reach us at any moment, hence
> that we have mapped all of ComponentLifecycleBase subclasses that use the
> logger variable.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
