[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14768863#comment-14768863
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-8750:
--------------------------------------------
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/778#issuecomment-140729409
Dear @wilderrodrigues, As I said I get your point and the moment that you
guys are on closing a version.
A mistake was made, the moment I noticed that I jumped in and checked the
problem and tried to fix it with this PR. No need to cut someone’s head with
adamantium claws.
Sure the task was huge, but simple. That was the point on giving it to a
less experienced student. I want them to see that even in huge systems like
CloudStack and others; there are codes that are not pretty and shiny.
The improvement factor depends on the concept you use, removing few lines
of code and using a more intuitive and standard name for a variable in a
hierarchic of classes can be considered an improvement. The same occur if we
remove the @Local annotation of that hierarchic, the task will affect 600+
classes, but it is a simple one.
Since you said that there is no way this PR will get accepted, I am closing
it.
Thanks for your time.
> Change the variable s_logger to non-static and fixed its name in
> “com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentLifecycleBase” and its subclasses
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-8750
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8750
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Components: Management Server
> Reporter: pedro henrique pereira martins
> Assignee: pedro henrique pereira martins
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Future
>
> Original Estimate: 48h
> Remaining Estimate: 48h
>
> We have noticed that every single class that is a subclass of
> “ComponentLifecycleBase” instantiate their on “logger” manually and uses a
> nonstandard name. We fixed that by changing the variable in
> “ComponentLifecycleBase” to protected and non-static and instantiated it
> using the method “getClass” from Object class. Therefore, we can reduce the
> code in a few hundred lines and use a more intuitive name for the logger
> variable.
> We do understand that “s_ something“ is a proper way to instantiate a static
> variable in ACS classes. However, in few of the subclasses of
> “com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentLifecycleBase” it was used names such as
> “LOGGER” (that is a proper name for static field as JAVA standards), log,
> status_logger and others.
> What we propose is to change the logger variable in
> “com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentLifecycleBase” to protected and remove
> its static and final declaration. Therefore we did the following in
> ComponentLifecycleBase:
> protected Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(getClass());
> This way, every single subclass of ComponentLifecycleBase, when
> instantiated would automatically have a logger instance for its proper class
> ready to be used.
> During that process we found a static method in class that used the
> “s_logger” variable in classes:
> com.cloud.network.element.VirtualRouterElement
> org.apache.cloudstack.network.element.InternalLoadBalancerElement
> To fix that we proposed to create a new class
> “com.cloud.network.element.HAProxyLBRule”, instantiate it with @Componente
> and inject into the aforementioned classes.
> That class will contain the following methods extracted from
> com.cloud.network.element.VirtualRouterElement class:
> com.cloud.network.element.HAProxyLBRule.containsOnlyNumbers(String, String)
> com.cloud.network.element.HAProxyLBRule.validateHAProxyLBRule(LoadBalancingRule)
> However we don't know if all analyzed classes are singletons, if some of
> analyzed classes aren't singletons. Therefore that change could have an
> impact on memory consumption. It will require a deeper analysis to check
> which classes are singleton or not and leave the “logger” as static in such
> classes.
> We have a solution at our own branch
> https://github.com/rafaelweingartner/cloudstack/tree/master-lrg-cs-hackday-003
> However, there is still the need to double-check the singleton problem.
> There is a PR we created in our first attempt to solve that problem:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/714
> The dev that starts working on this ticket can reach us at any moment, hence
> that we have mapped all of ComponentLifecycleBase subclasses that use the
> logger variable.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
