[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15103447#comment-15103447
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9210:
--------------------------------------------
Github user wido commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1309#issuecomment-172259457
@remibergsma We have this one running in production right now and it is
working as expected.
I spent some time in trying to get a test-case up and running, but I can't.
I can just tell you that by looking at the code this was a stupid thing which
wasn't caught during the addition of secondary IPs.
Our logs were full with Python stack traces and they are now gone :)
> KVM security re-programming fails
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9210
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9210
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Components: KVM
> Reporter: Wido den Hollander
> Assignee: Wido den Hollander
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: kvm, python, security_groups
>
> If security groups need to be re-programmed for an instance for some reason
> we currently do not provide the mandatory argument with secondary IPs to the
> Python function.
> This causes the programming of security groups to fail completely.
> Effectively the Instance looses it's connection.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
