[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15252669#comment-15252669
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-9088:
-------------------------------------------------------------
Commit ff0e7f3ec421fa0347878cfd79e9417c9bb01fa1 in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/master from [[email protected]]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=ff0e7f3 ]
Merge pull request #1126 from anshul1886/CLOUDSTACK-9088
CLOUDSTACK-9088: Update the description for migrateVirtualMachineWithVolume
apihttps://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9088
* pr/1126:
CLOUDSTACK-9088: Update the description for migrateVirtualMachineWithVolume
api.
Signed-off-by: Will Stevens <[email protected]>
> migrateto parameter associated with migrateVirtualMachineWithVolume API needs
> an example
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9088
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9088
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Components: API, Doc
> Reporter: Anshul Gangwar
> Assignee: Anshul Gangwar
>
> ISSUE:
> API docs for migrateVirtualMachineWithVolume API does not clearly state the
> format for parameter "migrateto". The doc suggests that it accepts
> volume/pool pair but fails to mention:
> 1. Format.
> 2. If value for volume/pool should be name, ID or UUID.
> 3. Whether "pool" referenced here is source or target.
> It may be difficult for users to perceive that the format needs to something
> like ...&migrateto[0].volume=<UUID>&migrateto[0].pool=<UUID>&...
> We need to provide example for better understanding like we have done for
> "iptonetworklist" parameter associated with deployVirtualMachine API.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)